Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[NEXT] fix(elementAt): force unsubscribe when it completes or errors #2672

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2017
Merged

[NEXT] fix(elementAt): force unsubscribe when it completes or errors #2672

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2017

Conversation

mpodlasin
Copy link
Contributor

@mpodlasin mpodlasin commented Jun 16, 2017

see #2501 and #2664

Force unsubscription logic in elementAt, when resulting Observable
completes or errors, so that all resources are disposed as fast
as possible, even if next operator in chain does not unsubscribe
reliably when given complete or error notification.

BREAKING CHANGE: unsubscription cadence has changed for `elementAt`,
this means side-effects related to unsubscription may occur at a
different time than in previous versions.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.001%) to 97.738% when pulling 0bfe6bb on mpodlasin:element-at-with-switch-map-fix-2 into 3003614 on ReactiveX:next.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 16, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.001%) to 97.738% when pulling 0bfe6bb on mpodlasin:element-at-with-switch-map-fix-2 into 3003614 on ReactiveX:next.

@benlesh benlesh merged commit 12bc7fe into ReactiveX:next Jun 19, 2017
@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Jun 6, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 6, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants